Reply to NASA's main confronting against the moon landing hoax theory

www.science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23Feb_2.htm is the first reply you can find using NASA's search engine on their website: http://www.nasa.gov/. This web page starts with the story of a phone call. Then, it tries to debunk on of the main points moon- landing hoax theorists make. That's the fact that there are no stars in the lunar photographs, even though the moon has no atmosphere. Their reply is that the stars were too dim to be seen because of the moon's reflection. But how could that be, when the reflection was at the surface and the stars were at the top. So, there should have been stars in the photos, but there weren't any trace of stars in the lunar photos. Why? Because the people who faked it believed that it wouldn't convince many scientists or photographers the "moon landing" was real unless they made a few "errors" in the photos.

However, the are right about how the American flag would be waving if the astronauts were struggling to plant it on the moon, because of little air resistance. But does that mean the flag waving couldn't be faked by artificial wind? Off course not. There are several natural and unnatural ways someone could have faked that seen.

The page goes on and on to talk about the moon rocks being so evident that it would be easier to go to the moon and get them than it would to fake it. But that isn't true. The believed "evidence" that these are "moon rocks" is:
* There are more isotopes in the rocks than there are in any rock on earth, as if they have been hit by rays from space that the earth doesn't get.
* The moon rocks have no moisture.
* The moon rocks have marks on them that seem to come from meteorites that the earth doesn't get.

The rocks could have been bombarded by atomic nuclei. Although earthly radioactive tools are small compared to the power of the sun, both time and exposure matter. The rocks may have been powdered and put together by scratch. That would explain the fact that there is no detectable moisture and that their marks on them. The rocks prove nothing. The "stars" error in the pictures do.